Can anyone help me identify what the writing on the Man's sweatshirt says?
(http://i1254.photobucket.com/albums/hh616/nasaman1/DurhamD_33_13_4_5x45_restore2.jpg) (http://s1254.photobucket.com/user/nasaman1/media/DurhamD_33_13_4_5x45_restore2.jpg.html)
Thanks,
- Mike
Might be "Hilfiger":
(http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f246/vgraphica/hilfiger_zpsirvjywzj.jpg) (http://s48.photobucket.com/user/vgraphica/media/hilfiger_zpsirvjywzj.jpg.html)
Thanks so much! I bet that is right.
Unless it's necessary, the contrast is way too high. For example, there is no definition between the two women's dresses on the viewer right. Zero, zip, nada. Unless such a level of contrast is needed, i.e. the tonal levels are that dark, it's too much.
Here is the original. (http://i1254.photobucket.com/albums/hh616/nasaman1/DurhamD_33_13_4_5x45.jpg) (http://s1254.photobucket.com/user/nasaman1/media/DurhamD_33_13_4_5x45.jpg.html)
At first I tried to make a distinction between the women's clothing, but I decided it would be just as good to leave them both about the same black level. Making up something that looks realistic is hard and I try to avoid that unless it is absolutely necessary. If you can figure out how to distinguish between the women's clothing that would be great.
Thanks,
- Mike
A textbook example of no contrast differences between the two women's clothes! There was none in the original.
I tried Shadows/Highlights to get some kind of separation on the ladies.
(http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm81/kiskaopr/DurhamD_33_13_4_5x45_zps4tivyi4o.jpg) (http://s294.photobucket.com/user/kiskaopr/media/DurhamD_33_13_4_5x45_zps4tivyi4o.jpg.html)