collapse

* Recent Topics

Cutiepie again by Marydh
[Yesterday at 04:14:59 PM]


Peeking around the tree by Hannie
[Yesterday at 02:29:04 PM]


Couple's Pose by Shadow
[Yesterday at 09:30:32 AM]


In his Sunday Best by coopmj
[June 13, 2019, 05:13:18 PM]


Young Gent by Lynnya
[June 13, 2019, 12:32:45 PM]


Faraway gaze by Candice
[June 13, 2019, 10:44:47 AM]


Colorize Cutiepie? by kiska
[June 13, 2019, 03:38:52 AM]


Sepia Couple by Mhayes
[June 12, 2019, 09:44:33 PM]


B&G with friends by Marydh
[June 06, 2019, 08:15:41 PM]


Graduate by Shadow
[June 06, 2019, 05:47:26 PM]

Author Topic: Long-ago portrait 'washed out'  (Read 621 times)

Offline Jo Ann Snover

  • OPR Resident Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: Long-ago portrait 'washed out'
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2019, 11:04:22 AM »
Thanks again for more feedback. I'm going to ask Tess to take a look at these suggestions and let me know what she'd like me to do.

Yesterday she said not to smooth out the skin (I specifically asked) so I don't want to do more work that isn't in line with the direction she provided.

Those of you on staff perhaps can confer with Tess about the approach?
Jo Ann

Offline Jo Ann Snover

  • OPR Resident Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: Long-ago portrait 'washed out'
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2019, 11:21:34 PM »
Tess asked me to do a smoothed version so QC could decide whether smoothed vs. not smoothed. I still don't like the smoothed version, but it's a frequency separation technique, masked and reduced opacity (Tess' request to tone down the smoothing)

Version 3 and 3-smoothed:




Jo Ann