Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Recent Posts
[September 16, 2014, 10:29:55 PM]

[September 14, 2014, 09:45:37 PM]

[September 14, 2014, 09:18:46 PM]

by Pat
[September 11, 2014, 01:32:15 PM]

[September 11, 2014, 08:22:10 AM]

[September 10, 2014, 03:36:30 PM]

[September 04, 2014, 07:28:06 PM]

[September 03, 2014, 12:29:04 AM]

[August 29, 2014, 02:10:24 PM]

[August 28, 2014, 09:36:05 PM]
OPR Theme-o-matic

Locations of visitors to this page
Total Members: 866
New This Month: 6
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Autumnal Equinox

Birthdays:
JohnG (47), gerry.m250 (63), ohfer (55)

Events:
There are no events today.
Sorry, you do not have permission to view pictures!
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Extra face?  (Read 833 times)
bjtx
OPR Long Time Hero
***
Offline Offline

Location: Texas (USA) near Dallas
Posts: 130


« on: June 09, 2012, 10:12:06 PM »

I've been considering this from Jona's gallery.  Upon closer inspection, I noticed an extra face. 
It puzzles me  Undecided

Logged

(aka - Betty )  CS6, PS CC,  Win 8.1; 150+ restorations so far & hope to do more Smiley  fav site http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/daily-dozen/
kiska
OPR Master
*****
Offline Offline

Location: NE Ala., NW Ga.
Posts: 1123



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2012, 02:39:00 AM »

I regret to inform you that the extra face IS part of the photo.  I love it!
The girl is looking around the woman's shoulder.
Logged

kiska
Photoshop CS5, MacPro
Hannie
Site Admin
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 3423



WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2012, 07:15:32 AM »

You may be able to use the red channel to see the face better and to do a little repairing. 

Logged

Hannie Scheltema
Distribution Coordinator
hannie@operationphotorescue.org
bjtx
OPR Long Time Hero
***
Offline Offline

Location: Texas (USA) near Dallas
Posts: 130


« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2012, 08:19:30 AM »

Kiska, I first wondered if the face was a genuine part of the original photo, but since there was no other part of her body showing, I wasn't sure.  It almost appears as if it is part of another photo, which was accidentally  adhered by storm moisture --   Thanks for your input.

Thanks for the suggestion, Hannie.
Logged

(aka - Betty )  CS6, PS CC,  Win 8.1; 150+ restorations so far & hope to do more Smiley  fav site http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/daily-dozen/
Tori803
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Minnesota
Posts: 659



WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2012, 12:44:45 PM »

It is a rather odd angle, but maybe that's what endears this photo to the family!

Tori
Logged

Tori
"Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." - Aristotle
klassylady25
OPR Master
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 721



« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2012, 05:15:53 PM »

I think it was another picture that was stuck to the one you're working on.
Logged
lurch
OPR Master
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Altadena, CA, USA
Posts: 544


« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2012, 06:19:36 PM »

I, too, think the 'extra' face is part of the photo. Note the exact outline of the woman covering her. Hard to envision a transfer that would not cover part of the woman, too. Her (I think it's a her, anway) body may or may not be hidden behind the woman's, or it may or may not be covered up by a transfer from another photo. Or she might be sitting backwards (relative to the other two) on a bench.
Logged

<C>
Jonas.Wendorf
OPR Resident Expert
****
Offline Offline

Location: Germany | Aalen
Posts: 279



WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2012, 01:46:57 AM »

Hi Betty,

I just uploaded this one to your gallery, maybe the full-res image will make it easier to see, what's going on Smiley!
If you think, you can't restore this one as it's too difficult, just let me know and I'll put it back in my gallery Smiley!

Thanks,
Jonas
Logged

Best regards,
Jonas
bjtx
OPR Long Time Hero
***
Offline Offline

Location: Texas (USA) near Dallas
Posts: 130


« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2012, 08:58:58 AM »

Thanks to everyone for the interesting & helpful comments.
Logged

(aka - Betty )  CS6, PS CC,  Win 8.1; 150+ restorations so far & hope to do more Smiley  fav site http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/daily-dozen/
glennab
OPR Master
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Gulfport (St. Petersburg), Florida
Posts: 3220



« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2012, 05:49:26 PM »

I realize that old mole-eyes has a lot of nerve jumping in with an opinion on this one, but it appears to me that the two women are sitting facing in opposite directions.  The woman in the front is blocking all but the very edge of the front of the shaded woman who's leaning on her shoulder/back.

GK
Logged

What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal. ~Albert Pine

(Photoshop CS5 /Mac Pro)
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: