Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Current fundraiser
Recent Posts
[Today at 01:25:10 AM]

[Yesterday at 11:25:38 PM]

[Yesterday at 11:22:13 PM]

[Yesterday at 11:05:04 PM]

[Yesterday at 10:20:38 PM]

[Yesterday at 02:55:08 PM]

[Yesterday at 02:02:28 PM]

[Yesterday at 12:19:07 PM]

[May 24, 2012, 07:23:17 PM]

[May 24, 2012, 02:33:22 PM]
OPR Theme-o-matic

Locations of visitors to this page
Total Members: 1580
New This Month: 9
New This Week: 3
New Today: 1
Memorial Day

Birthdays:
Pelican (58), melrcomp (35), PhotoPhixUp (64), jaycymru (40), ophiuci (32), PaulD (48)

Events:
There are no events today.
a king

Faded

OPR Biloxi Trip

Homecoming

Poll
Question: Which would be best for printing and sending to the owner?
Version 1 - 1 (8.3%)
Version 2 - 6 (50%)
Version 3 - 0 (0%)
Version 4 - 0 (0%)
None.  Needs more work. - 5 (41.7%)
Total Voters: 10

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Jacquelyn's Workshop  (Read 2251 times)
Jacquelyn
OPR Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10


« on: June 24, 2006, 04:01:05 AM »

On this photo, I couldn't decide which direction to take in returning it to "wedding album" level.
The white bits in their hair are pieces of confetti, not damage.

Versions are (obviously) in order of execution;
the last was made by layering v3 over v1 then adjusting transparency of v3 to produce v4.

Original at 72 pxi


Version 1

 
Version 2


Version 3


Version 4



Logged
vhansen
OPR Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 56


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2006, 12:00:32 PM »

I like version 3 best, but without the oval. I voted "needs more work" because of the pink cast and little bit left to repair. Overall, nice cleanup, especially on the jacket.
Logged

happyheart
OPR Long Time Hero
***
Offline Offline

Location: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 107


my feelings exactlly!


« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2006, 01:40:57 PM »

I voted needs more work, as I think you should forget the oval highlight and finish the clean up on the remainder of the dress, window, back left corner.  Perhaps a slight blur on the grooms jacket would help with the noise that is evident also.  The faces and oval highlight area look really good, but I would like to see the remainder in a cleaner condition.
Logged

If it's artsy or Photoshop, I'll give it a try!
aka Betty
Quoin
OPR Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17


QUOIN


« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2006, 11:30:56 PM »

I think you have done an astounding job - with such large patches of damage, great work. I prefer the second version - with the rest of the damage repaired. I personally don't love the oval effect, though I can see how it can help this photo. If you had version 2 repaired with and without cameo (fading to white around edges) You could give them 2 versions. Great effort.
Logged

The Future is waiting.....
Jacquelyn
OPR Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10


« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2006, 10:00:25 AM »

Thanks for the feedback! Very helpful thoughts. I recall reading some guidance on the project warning against wholesale repainting, so having other eyes and minds address the issues has great value to me.
Logged
Mark Wilson
OPR Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 63



WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2006, 10:15:59 AM »

Hi Jacquelyn,

I think you're doing a great job. (Can't find a "thumbs Up" emoticon!)

I agree with Happyheart about the jacket etc, the stitching on the jacket collar should also continue all the way up. Not convinced about the vignette.

If you decide to go for the vignette effect you might consider fading to white, a more traditional look for this kind of shot.

-Mark.
Logged

"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs." - Ansel Adams 1902-1984.
Jacquelyn
OPR Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10


« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2006, 11:12:54 AM »

Ok, so...
best would be completed windows and surround to the corners, complete lapel detail at jacket, and convert to black and white, blancing for best detail in shadow and highlights?

I considered knocking out the background and doing a gradient.  Will test and post when I get the rest finished.

Thank you!

Logged
John
OPR Master
*****
Offline Offline

Location: New York
Posts: 567



« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2006, 11:13:47 AM »

(Can't find a "thumbs Up" emoticon!)

workin' on it!  Smiley
Logged
allanpat
OPR Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2006, 11:54:15 AM »

version 2 with a bit more work - i don't think you should use the oval effect or any other sort of fade.  Returning the photo with the most image data intact gives them the most opportunity to reprint it in the future in the manner they'd like.
Logged
pcraft
OPR Long Time Hero
***
Offline Offline

Location: Brantford, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 173


« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2006, 05:38:20 PM »

I completely agree with Allanpat...     It's the most pleasing to my eyes...   Too Cool
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: